International Law Exam Model Answers links:
[DOWNLOAD] International Law Exam Model Answers
Posted on 10-Mar-2021
As regards the questions submitted but not included on this list, the majority of them asked for essays that seemed to me to be impossible to write a decent answer in a hour; some others were very well written but seemed to invite answers that...
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
[GET] International Law Exam Model Answers | updated!
Posted on 7-May-2021
Contrania then decides to lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations, pursuant to Article 35 of the U. Ruritania responds by arguing before the Security Council that: 1. How should Contraria respond? One of the provisions of...
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
International Law 2000 Paper-Solved MCQs Competitive Exams Set 1
Posted on 23-Mar-2021
Aragorn alleges that he is the direct descendent of the original owner of the ring, and that he is the rightful owner of the ring by reason of familial succession. Sauron contends that even if Aragorn can prove ownership of the ring by familial succession, the Court of Rowan is barred from granting any relief by reason of the Act of State Doctrine. The Supreme Court of the People's Republic of Rohan considers the non-justiciability of acts of foreign states to be a principle of international law. However, it is against Rohan domestic policy and laws to nationalize property without affording adequate compensation. In accordance with these policies, the Republic of Rohan has a law prohibiting its courts from applying the act of state doctrine, if the challenged state act is in violation of well established principles of international law.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
How To Answer Law Exam Questions (with Examples)
Posted on 12-Mar-2021
Rohan Law No. In doing so, please discuss the effect of the Mordor Law , if it is declared in violation of international law by the Court of Rohan? Legal scholars and international jurists often conditioned the legitimacy of preemption on the existence of an imminent threat — most often a visible mobilization of armies, navies, and air forces preparing to attack. The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. The United States will not use force in all cases to preempt emerging threats, nor should nations use preemption as a pretext for aggression. We will always proceed deliberately, weighing the consequences of our actions. To support preemptive options, we will: - build better, more integrated intelligence capabilities to provide timely, accurate information on threats, wherever they may emerge; - coordinate closely with allies to form a common assessment of the most dangerous threats; and - continue to transform our military forces to ensure our ability to conduct rapid and precise operations to achieve decisive results.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
International Law Flashcards
Posted on 15-May-2021
The purpose of our actions will always be to eliminate a specific threat to the United States or our allies and friends. The reasons for our actions will be clear, the force measured, and the cause just. The trade agreement was signed and ratified by all the parties. Prior to the agreement, all of the signatory states, along with the majority of other non-signatory states had minimum wage requirements substantially similar to those in the agreement. The United States and Urbania continue to trade with Lowagea, as it has a huge supply of Reallineed, manufactured by a state-owned company. Lowagea has never agreed that the minimum wage is a good thing and has never provided one. Although the Lowegean constitution proclaims the absolute rights of the workers, it appears that workers who refuse to work for all of their assigned periods are being chained to their machines without food, water, or bathroom breaks until they are finished.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Jessup: List Of Questions For Basic Preparation
Posted on 18-Apr-2021
Last year, New York State passed a statute prohibiting any persons or companies subject to NY state jurisdiction from trading with Lowagea or any other country that trades with Lowagea. Resourcia alleges that Lowagea is in violation of international law. Discuss the validity of these allegations, whether and how they might be decided, and also any other legal issues arising from these facts which seem likely to have legal consequences.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Questions & Answers: International Law
Posted on 27-Apr-2021
Doe alleges that the US authorities then flew him to Syria and handed him over to Syrian authorities, who tortured him for one year in order to extricate information about his alleged links to an Al Qaeda sleeper cell in Canada. John Doe was released by Syrian authorities after one year because they concluded he had no link to Al Qaeda. Doe states that he repeatedly begged US authorities not to send him to Syria because he would be tortured or killed there. Advise Doe as to his legal recourse, if any, against the United States government.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Study Aids On Reserve By Series
Posted on 16-Mar-2021
The prohibition of genocide is considered to be a jus cogens norm. Explain what jus cogens means. Explain at least two legal effects of the fact that the prohibition of genocide is a jus cogens norm. Question 2: Since the second half of the twentieth century international courts and tribunals have proliferated. One of the often-mentioned consequences of this process is fragmentation of international law. Explain, with the help of at least one concrete example, what fragmentation of international law means in the light of proliferation of courts and tribunals. Explain under what circumstances the ICJ has jurisdiction to settle an inter-state dispute. The government of Aspatria denies these accusations and states that: i the interrogation techniques used by the Aspatrian authorities do not amount to torture within the meaning of the ICCPR; and ii Aspatria is presently at war with a neighbouring state and has proclaimed a state of emergency, accordingly it is line with the ICCPR temporarily not obliged to uphold the prohibition of torture.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Law And Legal Studies: Home
Posted on 21-May-2021
Explain what rules of public international law apply to questions of interpretation of treaty provisions. At one point the situation escalates and Rotania threatens to enforce its rights through bombing parts of Adova. As a response, Adova decides to bomb military strategic targets in Rotania. Discuss the attack of Adova on Rotania in the light of public international law. Subsequently, elections were held and President Porfirio Lobo was elected. A large Honduran community lives in Nicaragua supporting Zelaya. This community disagrees with the removal of Mr. Zelaya from office and with the outcome of the recent election. As a response, they have been demonstrating peacefully in front of the Honduran Embassy for 5 days. The police have been monitoring the demonstrations. However, at one point the crowd becomes more violent and they manage to enter the premises and cause substantial damage. The day after the Nicaraguan authorities decide to send extra forces to the Embassy to stop the violence and arrest the protesters.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Contracts I And II: Past Exams And Answers
Posted on 28-Apr-2021
Can Nicaragua be held accountable under international law for the damages caused to the Honduran Embassy? Question 7: It has been argued that former heads of state or government as well as certain former high-ranking ministers should be more careful when they travel abroad as a result of the rulings by the House of Lords in the Pinochet case and the International Court of Justice in the Arrest Warrant case. Discuss the potential difficulties that such persons might encounter during their travels as exemplified by these two cases. Question 8: States are considered the original and principal legal subjects of public international law. Provide and discuss 2 examples illustrating the fact that states possess the most full-blown form of legal personality under international law. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the fact that states are still the primary subjects in the field of international law-creation.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Outline Answers To Essay Questions
Posted on 23-Mar-2021
The Great Barrier Reef, a marine park, is situated in the territorial sea of Australia. Australia wants to prohibit ships carrying potentially polluting substances such as oil from passing through its marine park. At an emergency session, the United Nations Security Council called for a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation conforming to international standards. Israel responded by stating that 'Israel is a democratic nation. Israel has the ability and the right to investigate itself, not to be investigated by any international board. They have been endowed with a special legal force, i. They have a rank and status superior to those of all the other rules of the international community. A treaty contrary to a jus cogens norm is null and void ab initio. Jus cogens norms can also have effect on making reservations: inconsistency with a peremptory norm makes a reservation inadmissible. International law has been developed in a fragmented manner for certain policy areas as problems were identified.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Public International Law Exam Questions Sample
Posted on 18-Mar-2021
This development entails that international law has developed to address certain problems, or in a functional manner. Examples of relevant areas of law are human rights law, the law on the use of force, humanitarian law, international trade law, international environmental law, international economic law and the law of the sea. The distinct bodies of law that emerged as a result of the development of functional areas of law, in response to identified problems, not only provide substantive rules of law but also led to the establishment of international courts and tribunals with competences to decide cases within a distinct body of law. A problem which arises in the context of the proliferation of courts is that a case or related cases may be brought before different courts or tribunals, which may come to different decisions as to which of the parties violated international law or to different interpretations of the law, thereby contributing to the fragmentation of international law.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Study Aids For Law Students
Posted on 15-Apr-2021
Additionally, students need to exemplify their answer with at least one concrete example. See e. The following states can be parties to a dispute: States Members of the United Nations and other States which have become parties to the Statute of the Court or which have accepted its jurisdiction under certain conditions. The Court is competent to entertain a dispute only if the States concerned have accepted its jurisdiction. In order to find an answer, the Court in the LaGrand case relied on the Vienna Convention, Article 31 of which is also part of customary international law.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Public International Law Exam Questions And Answers
Posted on 5-Mar-2021
This question is about the use of force. Article 2 4 of the UN Charter prohibits states to use or to threat with the use of force against other states. There are only two exceptions to the prohibition. Firstly, a state is allowed to use force against another state when the state is authorized by the UN Security Council article 39 jo. Secondly, a state is allowed to use force against another state in light of self-defence article 51 UN Charter. In this case there is no authorization by the UN Security Council. Furthermore, a self-defense claim can only be justified if it meets the criteria of article 51 UN Charter and the criteria of customary law.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
IRAC For Law School Essays And Exams (with Examples)
Posted on 18-Apr-2021
There needs to be an armed attack, the response should be proportional and necessary and the Security Council should be informed. Students need to evaluate the criteria and realize the problem is that Rotania has not attacked Adova but merely treated to attack Adova. This concerns the debatable concept of anticipatory self-defense. It will depend on the argumentation of the students how many points they will receive for this line of argument. The first phase refers to the inaction of the Iranian government with regard to their obligations to protect the embassy of the United States.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Law Questions & Answers - Oxford University Press
Posted on 18-Mar-2021
Iran was held responsible for its omission to protect the embassy of the United States, seeing the fact that they were fully aware of their obligations, they had the means at their disposal to perform their obligations and failed completely to comply with these obligations para. The second phase of the Tehran Hostages case refers to the acknowledgement and approval of the Iranian authorities of the acts exercised by the students. This lead to the conclusion of the ICJ that the actions taken by the students were now translated into acts of that State, Iran was held responsible for its own actions. The students had become agents of the Iranian State for whose acts the State itself was internationally responsible.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
International Law 2000 Paper-Solved MCQs Competitive Exams Set 2
Posted on 6-Mar-2021
First of all, former heads of state can be held responsible for act committed in private capacity while in office. The question in this respect raises whether the acts amounting to international crimes are or can be committed in private capacity. This specific question was addressed to some extent in the Pinochet case. According to the House of Lords the immunity functional of a former head of state did not prevent his extradition for torture.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Sample Exams - Study Aids For Law Students - Library Guides At BYU Law Library
Posted on 7-May-2021
Nevertheless, it remains unclear what this exactly means: did he commit torture in private capacity, is torture not a kind of conduct that attracts functional immunity? Several possible answers can be imagined. As the question already indicates the answer should include some comparison between states and non-state actors. These two judgments can also be used as examples: - States undoubtedly have the capacity to bring an international claim. In any event, the answer should somehow focus on or reflect a comparison between state and non-state actors. An important advantage of the fact that states are the primary subjects in the field of international law-creation is that states need to apply and enforce the international rules at the domestic level.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Carolina Academic Press
Posted on 26-Apr-2021
So if they make the law, the chance is higher that they will comply with these rules. A remarkable disadvantage of this primary role of the states is related to the changing structure of international law; namely, the proliferation and the increasing importance of non-state actors in international law. The international legal system regulating the role of and the relationship between the different actors does not reflect these changes by, for instance, endowing non-state actors with the appropriate form of power in the field of international law-making. The right to innocent passage enjoyed by third states vessels does not prevent coastal states from adopting laws and regulations in respect of the conservation of the living resources of the sea Art. Moreover, Part. XII Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment , particularly articles and , actually oblige states to take certain protective measures. In conclusion, Australia is permitted if not obliged to take measures to ensure the protection of its marine park.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Law School Exams
Posted on 10-May-2021
The UN SC is certainly authorized to take up this matter: i in as far as this dispute may give rise to friction or to an international dispute: Art. Under this chapter, the UN SC may make recommendations or decide which measures shall be taken to maintain or restore international peace or security Art. The call for a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigations falls under measures without force, as referred to in article 41 as this list in non-exhaustive. Measures taken by the UN SC are binding art. For the purposes of determining the existence of a threat to the peace it is immaterial whether the incident occurred in the open sea or within the territorial sea of Israel.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
State Bar Exam Questions And Sample Answers
Posted on 11-Apr-2021
An easy way to explain the IRAC method is to talk about the things that are most likely to trip you up when using it. Instead, just write down the issue as a question or a statement. I remember writing a short introduction in a problem based assignment which I thought was different to an exam, for some unknown reason even when the lecturer told us not to! In my defence it was early on in my first year fine — second half of my first year. A problem that many law students face is failing to adapt to the academic environment of law school. It takes time to reverse old habits and realise that an introduction is no longer necessary. Save the extra words for those 7, and 10, word essays! Being concise is particularly important in exams when you have time limits to separate students into into credit, distinction and high distinction categories. This is enforced by lecturers by imposing low word limits. A 3, word assignment might sound like a lot before you start but most people will find themselves scrambling to delete words at the end.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Questions & Answers: International Law | LexisNexis Store
Posted on 17-Apr-2021
Be concise. Word limits are also used to identify students who understand the most important concepts and reward them for it. You will always get the most marks if you: can identify the key issues relevance ; and are able to thoroughly consider the issues for each being concise. This might mean you need remove any discussion of minor ancillary issues, even if what you wrote is correct. For example, a 30 mark essay capped at words might in fact have 40 marks available, depending on what your response is. This generally gives the lecturers some scope when marking papers. However, you would need to write far more than words to discuss all the issues to get all those marks, which is obviously not allowed. Write on point and with precision and you will increase your chances to score full marks. Similar to the issue section, limit it to one sentence and spend your effort on the far more important analysis section — this is where all the marks lie. Be flexible with the rule and analysis sections, and structure your answer to help the reader The ideal question to answer is one where the various issues you need to discuss and explain are entirely separate from one another and your structure is literally: issue; rule; analysis; and conclusion perhaps repeated three or four times.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
FindTestAnswers.com
Posted on 10-Mar-2021
You might get a few of these in an exam, but unfortunately, they are not in abundance! Most questions will have overlapping issues and this is where structure becomes really important. For written essays and assignments you will have time to plan this out properly. In exams, it will come down to practice, so make sure you run through as many practice exams as you can to find out the best structure for any particular question exam topics are frequently repeated so you can figure out what will be on your exam early.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
IRAC: How To Answer Law Problem Questions - The Jet Lawyer
Posted on 14-Apr-2021
Below you will find a few different examples. Corporations law — IRAC method in an exam script This pdf file is also in my post on exam scripts which you should definitely visit to learn how IRAC can be used when preparing your exam notes.
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
Hypos And Practice Exams | Berkeley Law
Posted on 20-Mar-2021
Both Dangala and Trunda now claim sovereignty over Gora and the dispute has been submitted before the International Court of Justice. You are appointed by the Prime Minister of Dangala as the legal counsel to represent the State before the World Court. What would be your legal advice? The device is planted in State C, explodes over State D, killing all those on board, the majority of whom are nationals of State B. Which States have claims to jurisdiction and according to what principles under international law? The persons who were killed by Laurens were captured members of the security forces of the Xania government. Some years after the murders described in the previous paragraph, Laurens emigrated to Zanjia , a neighbouring State, and became a Zanjian national. Would Zanjia be acting in conformity with public international law if it asserted criminal jurisdiction over Laurens in respect of the murders committed by him in Xania?
[ VIEW ANSWER ] [ Find Similar ]
No comments:
Post a Comment